Peer Review Process

IJELT: Indonesian Journal of Education, Language, and Technology maintains the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

All research articles published in the IJELT: Indonesian Journal of Education, Language, and Technology undergo full peer review, the key characteristics of which are listed below:

  • At least two suitably qualified experts review all research articles.
  • The journal's Editors-in-Chief make all publication decisions based on the reviews provided.
  • Members of the international Editorial Boards generally lend insight, advice, and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief and assist in decision-making on specific submissions.
  • Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows the International Journal of Linguistics, Culture, and Communication to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.
  • IJELT: Indonesian Journal of Education, Language, and Technology additionally benefits through the manuscript referral process from the high-quality peer review conducted by established journals.

 

Peer review of referred papers:

Editors of the Indonesian Journal of Education, Language & Technology will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when editors decide that further review is needed.


Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted directly to the IJELT: Indonesian Journal of Education, Language, and Technology will be fully peer-reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.